Last
week I discussed which subjects I was following and I would like to complement
that with an example of my weekly requirements. On Wednesday there is a lecture
in the afternoon lasting two hours. On Friday there is a seminar lasting for
two hours. Of course both need to be heavily prepared.
One
starts on Monday by checking the course description and scrolling down to the
relevant week. There you can read a small introduction to this week’s subject
and what material is prescribed. In this case the subject is the overlap of finable
and punishable offences. Because of the principle of una via, the government
has to select either to fine or to punish by criminal law; once it has done
one, it is excluded from doing the other.
Prescribed
to read are two chapters from the book, about 80 pages in total. Assuming one
reads a page every 6 minutes (which is still quite fast when you consider that you
need to keep making notes and should understand everything you are reading),
this alone will take 8 hours. One is also to become familiar with specific laws,
in this case 11 pages, and read the required jurisprudence, in this case
another 61 pages. Jurisprudence is special because you can usually suffice by
reading either the provided summary or an included annotation, though during
the test you need to have highlighted where the Court itself has made its
decision if you want to be able to quote it quickly and efficiently. It is not
strange if this process takes another 8 hours, but with skimming it can take as
little as two or three.
At
Wednesday’s lecture the reading material and some of the jurisprudence is explained
in more detail. Depending on the speaker, this can be incredibly illuminating
or incredibly pointless. In this case the speaker was very informative but
lacked real structure in their lecture making it difficult to make accurate
notes. Their slides contained handy summaries though, so that combined with his
explanations the lecture was quite useful.
After
the lecture, it is time to prepare for the seminar. For this week we had to
answer seven questions about the literature, like ‘Is it possible to impose
community service for committing an economical offence?’. Having read the
material, most questions just require you to look up the details while you
already know the general question. For the above question, the literature
explained that with a literal explanation of the law, it should not be allowed,
but that the courts have allowed it anyway. All that had to be done knowing
that, is to find the page it was explained on to quote the relevant decision.
Finally there were two case studies, with nine in-depth questions that take a
little longer to answer.
All in
all, this homework takes about 20 hours to complete, which makes sense since
you should be taking two or three of them each semester.
No comments:
Post a Comment